Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Building Information Modelling (BIM)

This is an article I have written for publication on our website. I thought I'd post it here too in case anyone has any comments.

Introduction
My first introduction to the modelling of buildings was during my time at Durham University in the 1990s. I studied for a PhD in the computer modelling of reinforced concrete beam to column connections. This involved developing computer models using finite element analysis and then comparing these virtual models under load against actual test specimens. I also assisted in the computer sessions with the undergraduates, helping to teach a CAD package that worked with parametric building elements as opposed to traditional 2D line drawings.

In 2010, Building Information Modelling (BIM) has made significant leaps forward and is now very much part of many construction professionals' lives. By using the geometry and spatial relationships, quantities and properties of the building elements within a BIM, real efficiencies and improvements in accuracy are being made in the design, construction and maintenance of buildings.

Increasingly at NBS, the technical information we are producing is rich and highly structured and is a BIM in its own right. The NBS Research and Development team are now in a position to make use of this technical information and give construction professionals some very exciting software solutions.

Geometry and spatial relationships

When most people think of BIM they think of 3D CAD, and indeed, this is a very big part of it.

The immediate benefit is the fantastic 3D models that are automatically generated from the 2D lines drawn and the element properties within the software. This gives amazing visualisations that the designer can present to the client before commencement of construction. It also offers infinite 2D plans and elevations that can be cut from the 3D model on demand. Figure 1 below shows a stunning visualisation example created using Graphisoft ArchiCAD, and rendering engine Artlantis.

(Credit: Artlantis rendering by Thierry Tutin)

Of course, there is more to BIM than visualisations, as each building element knows what it is. For example, whether an element is a door, window, pipe or wall. Within BIM software, relationships and behaviours are defined between these elements. A door cannot be greater in size than the wall that contains it. If a wall is removed from the model, then the doors and windows it contains are also removed. More complex relationships can also be developed, for example, a rule that each door must have a light switch within a defined distance. This sort of functionality is clearly not possible within traditional 2D CAD.

Once the major building elements are in place, it is possible for architects, structural engineers and mechanical engineers to work together on the same BIM. The spatial relationships defined can then ensure that there are no clashes between, for instance, the mechanical engineer’s duct work and the structural engineer’s steelwork.

A well documented example of this collaborative working on a huge project was in the development of Heathrow Airport Terminal Five; the entire project team worked off a single BIM for the design and construction of the buildings. This has been held up as a classic case study for the success of BIM, and estimates are that this may have saved as much as 10% on costs.

Quantities

With traditional 2D plans and elevations, quantities such as volumes or areas of materials or numbers of components have to be calculated accumulatively.

With a BIM, quantities can be calculated automatically by the software, making automatic generation of template bills of quantities, door and window schedules an instant operation.

The screenshot below shows how simple it is to create a door schedule in Autodesk Revit. It is possible to select the fields required, then at the click of a button the software loops through all of the elements in the BIM identifying the doors and creating the schedule. Schedules could easily be created for other elements, such as walls or floors, showing lengths, areas, or volumes.

Figure 2 – Selecting the columns for your schedule


Figure 3 – A dynamic schedule that displays the values in the BIM

The big advantage of scheduling and taking off quantities using BIM software is that changes in the graphical view of the model are automatically reflected in the schedule, and changes in the schedule are automatically reflected in the graphical interface.

Building element properties

A NBS specification does not contain structured information about geometry, spatial relationships or quantities, but it does contain a huge amount of information about the properties of building elements. We are currently working on greatly improving the structure of this data to the point where NBS will be a Building Information Model in its own right. Each product in the specification will have a property set of marked up data, with typical options against each property. The relationship to guidance, technical standards and Building Regulations will be improved. Finally, the supporting information required for a contractor to install the product on site, for the designer to test that performance requirements upon completion and for the owner to maintain the building will be available.

Examples of use of the NBS BIM will include:
  • An architect specifying a product by defining the required properties. The specification will be passed to the contractor who will be able to select from a list of available products that meet or exceed the requirements
  • As the building elements have properties that can be interpreted by computer software, this will present exciting opportunities to do calculations, such as the quantity of embodied carbon or of recycled content. Opportunities such as the automatic calculation of BREEAM points or automatic Building Regulation approval will become possible
  • The comprehensive database of building element properties will also provide building owners and facility managers with improved accuracy and time savings when replacement products are required or when the building is refurbished, altered or eventually dismantled.
Use of data from different Building Information Models

It is unlikely that all of the information from a construction project can be contained in a single BIM. More typically there will be a number of BIMs that are stored in different proprietary format. For example, the architect’s CAD model could be in ArchiCAD format, the engineer’s CAD model in Revit and the specification information within NBS.
Linking models through a common reference
It is crucial that links can be made between the different BIMs and that information can be exported from one BIM and imported into another. Traditionally, in the UK, the relationship between the drawing, specification and bill of quantities has been the Common Arrangement of Work Sections (CAWS). This was first published in 1987 by CPIC, a committee representing major institutes across the UK construction industry (RIBA, RICS, CIBSE and ICE). CAWS allows a building component to be labelled by reference and title on drawings and in the specification and bill of quantities.
Recently at NBS, we have developed a software API that allows other BIM software to reference a project specification and associate items in a CAD model with the specification clauses CAWS reference. So the designer can link an element in the CAD model such as a window with the clause in the NBS specification about the same window type.
The software API allows for improved efficiency savings and accuracy by helping to automate the process of annotation. Accuracy is improved further through the ability to report on the validity of the annotations prior to issuing the specification and drawings.
Figure 4 shows a screenshot from a prototype application with NBS Building and Graphisoft ArchiCAD interoperating. The CAD model has been annotated using NBS clause information. An annotation report has then been generated highlighting any corrections that are required prior to issue. This is a first step from NBS towards BIM integration between the CAD model and the specification.


Figure 4 – CAD and NBS working together
Importing and exporting information from BIMs
To go any further than the simple linking of two models through unique identifiers requires an agreed non-proprietary file format. Information can then be exported from one model to this file format and then imported into another model and round tripped. An example of this would be the architect designing the original building structure in Autodesk Revit, exporting this data into a non-proprietary file format and then the structural engineer then importing this into Bentley Microstation. The structural engineer could make amends and then export the data for the Architect to receive to complete the “round trip”.
The two main non-proprietary file formats supported by most of the main CAD packages are Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) and Green Building XML (gbXML). Figure 5 below shows the export options in Autodesk Revit to both gbXML and IFC format. 

Figure 5 – Exporting the Revit BIM to IFC format

Having information in an industry open standard format allows all members of the project team, owners, operators, designers, constructors, regulators and other stakeholders to be able to work with BIM data from cradle to grave. It also allows software developers to produce applications that can work with data in a standard format to produce applications that analyse the energy consumption or structural performance of a building.
BuildingSMART are the international organisation that is responsible for IFC development. NBS are members of BuildingSMART, and we are actively looking into ways of importing IFC structured data into NBS and exporting NBS data into IFC format.
Conclusions
Building Information Modelling has come a long way in a relatively short time. It is being used by many in the construction industry to make efficiency savings and to improve the accuracy and coordination of documentation.
It is common for building information to be held in different models. Relationships must be built between the data to exploit the full benefit of BIM, and open standard formats must be used to translate data from one proprietary format to another.

6 comments:

  1. Nick Greenwood5 March 2010 11:40

    As a 'front line' user of ArchiCAD the advantages of BIM have long been apparent with the use of a 3D model eliminating may errors in coordination and greatly improving productivity and workflow. With the developing connection between BIM and NBS this improved workflow and productivity is only set to increase with designers now being able to develop drawn information whilst adding specification annotation and forming the overall project spec.

    However, one issue has always blighted this advancement in technology since its inception -the interoperability of different BIM systems, or, lack there of. Stephen has eluded to the need to develop this side of the technology by breaking down the barriers between different software developers for the benefit of the whole construction industry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nick, I would wholeheartedly agree with this - it is currently one the greatest problems we are facing as a practice and it makes working with other consultatnts a nightmare sometimes.
    More and more, we find ourselves outputting to certain formats in a single third party piece of software just so we can run one coordination excercise (e.g. geometric coordination), and this really does defeat the purpose.
    There is no doubt that there is a commercial need to protect software products, but limiting output and interoperability sends out a poor message. We are years away from a 'one product does it all' (if this ever happens) and it is a simple fact that complex information requires complex information handling software.
    Widening interoperability will increase uptake and widen customer bases. Limiting connections frustrates users and is a poor advert for the product (BIM is a 'product' as well ...)

    ReplyDelete
  3. BIM has got to be the way that all building design will be done in the future. We are structural engineers and have adopted Revit Structure throughout the practice. We are excited by the potential that this approach to deisgn offers. We are already seeing the benefits of coordinated information within our own work and are actively seeking connections with Architects and services engineers using Revit to maximise the benefits to our Clients. And that is all before some of the opportunities referred to in the article are exploited! BIM is a solution as well as a product! John Staves is Managing Director of Michael Aubrey Partnership and can be contacted at john.staves@mapl.co.uk

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a firm advocate of the benefits of BIM for over ten years, I have - of late - come to the more realistic (cynical?) conclusion that the biggest stumbling block to producing a built form from a virtual building model is the fact that no end of cleverness will always end up at a Man With a Hammer and (if you're lucky) a poorly reproduced drawing folded up in his back pocket. He may, or may not, follow the design information he is handed - experience has shown me that no end of subjective factors may sway his decision to do things differently, and it may be nothing more superficial than whether his tea was made the way he likes it this morning.

    I know that automated-factory-produced buildings is an idea that carries a glimmer of possibility in resolving this problem in the procurement chain, but we are a long way off from fully automated construction akin to the motor trade, etc; especially because, at the end of the day, every piece of construction work is - at some level - a prototype.

    I'm concerned that no end of successful early-stage integration between ICT systems will ever make any effect on this problem. I'm not saying we should give up on the idea - far from it - but when you look at the bigger picture then there are a lot more issues to sort out before the product can fulfil its potential.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Paul anderton19 April 2010 10:03

    The ability to link specification data into BIM models would be wonderful, could I just ask why it appears you are ignoring the Apple Mac OS yet again? Surely this software development is an ideal opportunity to right this wrong? In the BIM world ArchiCAD is the leading light, a programme written for the Mac OS, a platform which is a significant force in the BIM/3D CAD world. Please stop ignoring us Mac users!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Paul,

    Re: ArchiCAD - I think this is a super application and Figure 4 above is actually of a working prototype of NBS and ArchiCAD working together.

    Re: Apple Mac - I completely understand the frustrations of those using Apple Macs and NBS. I know it's not ideal using virtual PC/parallels/word processing discs. I wonder if the solution to this will come from advances in Internet technologies. The likes of Google Docs that work through the web browser work equally well on both IE/Windows and Safari/Macs. This is better than say applications such as MS Access and Internet Explorer that just have versions for the Windows PC.

    I cannot say too much publically about our medium term plans but I’d say that the way technology currently is - the most likely solution will be an online application that is not dependent on platform/browser.

    I do hope that we can make this happen in the not too distant future.

    Kind regards,

    Stephen

    ReplyDelete